In order for a view to qualify, it needs to come from a real user. It’s why you can’t just hammer the F5 button on your own video pages to kick up a few thousand views and make your video start trending. YouTube does some vetting of views to make sure they’re valid. The first thing you need to understand is what, specifically, counts as a view. There are actually a lot of possible reasons why view counts may differ, so let’s talk about them all. I would assume, however, that videos with millions of views will show larger discrepancies. Now, obviously, I don’t have a video with millions of views to compare. It seems like only the high count videos are affected. Doing a quick comparison, most other videos on the channel have the same number of views between the two. Most other videos on that channel range from under 100 views to around 1,000 views. In the individual analytics for the video, it is rounded up to “82.0k” for the overview, but the actual chart shows 81,950. On the video page itself, however, YouTube displays only 81,950 views. In the YouTube Creator Studio, the analytics tell me that the video has 81,959 views. For example, my test account has a video with over 80,000 views. The difference in view counts is typically a discrepancy between a video page itself and that video’s data in the creator studio. The like and comment counts, the view counts, and all of that information is the same regardless of which version of the creator studio you’re using. Since we’re not really talking about the differences between the two platforms, I can say one thing is still the same: the back-end data. You can still use the classic creator studio, but it’s a pain to have to click through to it every time you want to manage something on your channel, especially when there’s no reason to leave out some basic features. For creators who are putting a lot of time and effort into their channels, this usually means something you were used to using is gone now. For small-scale, casual YouTube creators, this isn’t a problem, since you probably weren’t using many of those features.
It’s missing a lot of features that are available in Studio Classic, and which YouTube seems to be in no hurry to port over. It’s a larger, more widescreen-friendly design, with less wasted space, and a more coherent design that meshes with other Google management properties, like Google Analytics or Google Ads. YouTube has been slowly rolling out the beta version of their new YouTube Studio. Does a Discrepancy Matter? Studio Classic and Studio Beta
0 kommentar(er)
